- VanEck suggests funding US Bitcoin reserve with mining royalties.
- Proposed fund initially $100 million.
- Congressional support needed for larger initiatives.

VanEck’s Matthew Sigel proposed a US strategic Bitcoin reserve funded via mining royalties during the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas on May 27, 2025.
The initiative addresses funding a national Bitcoin reserve without direct government spending, drawing legal and market interest.
Funding through Mining Royalties
VanEck, a prominent investment firm, proposes a budget-neutral method to create a US Bitcoin reserve by using mining royalties as funding. This move, backed by Matthew Sigel, was introduced at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference.
Sigel suggests that the government should start with a $100 million allocation via executive action. Larger efforts would require Congress due to potential legal challenges. He emphasizes integrating small amendments in bills to achieve this.
“The problem with executive action is that it’s going to prompt lawsuits. And anything over $100 million is going to get sued by the Elizabeth Warrens of the world. So, I would say start with something maybe in the Exchange Stabilization Fund for $100 million.” – Matthew Sigel, Head of Digital Assets Research, VanEck
Environmental and Financial Benefits
The proposal highlights tax exemptions and incentives for miners using waste methane, which could benefit both environmental and strategic Bitcoin acquisition efforts, possibly influencing other digital assets.
Financial implications of the proposal revolve around the exchange stabilization fund and tax incentives. Politically, it requires overcoming potential legal hurdles, while it strategically aligns with renewed pro-crypto stances in US policies.
Global Implications and Industry Impact
Such a move could set a precedent for global Bitcoin reserve practices, impacting market dynamics. Historical examples, like El Salvador’s approach, illustrate the growing trend of governmental Bitcoin accumulation.
The proposal, if accepted, may affect mining economics and industry strategies. Patterns of government involvement in digital currencies and infrastructure investment potentially widen, inviting analysis on lawmaker collaboration and technological progress.