Bitcoin (BTC) may be facing the risk of a catastrophic “bank run,” according to Justin Bons, founder and CIO of Cyber Capital.
A “bank run” occurs when customers simultaneously withdraw money from a financial institution due to concerns about liquidity.
Bitcoin Cannot Withstand Mass Retracement, Bons Says
In a series of social media posts, Bons highlighted key shortcomings in Bitcoin’s transaction processing capabilities, self-governance model, and cybersecurity. According to him, these restrictions could lead to a crisis, destabilizing the network and causing losses to investors.
Bons’ analysis focused on Bitcoin’s limited transaction processing capacity, which he calculated at only about seven transactions per second (TPS). Using data from Glassnode and Bitcoin’s source code, he argued that the 33 million users of the Bitcoin chain could face a bottleneck if a panic triggered simultaneous exits.
“At this rate, the queue would last 1.82 months under optimal conditions. In practice, however, transactions get stuck and are eventually erased, making it impossible for smaller parties to exit unless they pay extremely high fees,” Bons explain.
Bons warns that this limit could lead to a “death spiral” where after a price shock, miners are forced to shut down operations, slowing the network further. The resulting delays can deepen the row of details, creating a vicious cycle of significant hash value reduction, extended block times, and endlessly falling prices.
In his criticism of BTC, Bons claims Bitcoin’s transaction capabilities are insufficient for real-world use. He compares Bitcoin’s 7 TPS to other systems, such as Visa’s 5,000 TPS, or even competitors in the crypto space that can surpass 10,000 TPS without sacrificing decentralization.
“There is no use case that can be supported by 7 TPS. Self-regulation for BTC is a dangerous story. The only scalable way for BTC to be adopted is through centralized governance institutions, which contradicts its principle as ‘free money,’” he said.
Bons also questioned Bitcoin’s long-term sustainability, citing its shrinking security budget as a serious problem that could exacerbate the risks he outlined. The series of posts also touches on Bitcoin’s deviation from its original vision as a “peer-to-peer (P2P) cryptocurrency.” He regrets that network restrictions and governance have turned it into a speculative asset rather than an actual means of exchange.
Bons’s statements sparked a strong debate on X (formerly Twitter). Patrick Flanagan, a self-described technology expert, dismissed these claims.
“This is pure fantasy. If this was going to happen, it would have happened years ago,” Flanagan reasoning.
Bons refuteasserts that this risk increases as the number of users increases. He noted that even a small portion of users leaving could trigger a runoff, and that the larger the network, the more severe the problem.
Other users highlight Potential alternatives, such as trading wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) on Ethereum, thereby bypassing Bitcoin’s underlying layer limitations. Bons recognize this but note that wrapped BTC users could exit quickly while on-chain users will be stuck, exacerbating the sell-off. The discussion also extended to Bitcoin’s self-governance model.
“This is something that advocates of self-regulation should pay attention to. Just a little FUD and people are stuck with their money,” Joel Venezuela of DashPay comment.
Bons replied, admit The difficult position in which he found himself as an advocate of cypherpunk and self-management. Another user made the comparison to gold, ask questions How long will it take to liquidate global gold? Bons counter-argument that while gold also has practical limits, its theoretical tradability far exceeds that of Bitcoin, making it less susceptible to such congestion.
Critics of Bons’ analysis argue that Bitcoin has weathered similar concerns in the past without collapsing. However, his warning joins a growing chorus calling for a reassessment of Bitcoin’s scalability and usability.
Despite his gloomy view of Bitcoin, Bons remains optimistic about the broader cryptocurrency space. There is still a lot of hope for crypto as a whole,” he concluded, suggesting that the original Bitcoin principle is now thriving in other blockchain projects.
Meanwhile, while Bitcoin remains the dominant cryptocurrency, debates over its scalability and durability continue. Bons’ warning is a stark reminder of the challenges Bitcoin faces as it seeks wider adoption in a changing financial space. Elsewhere, Galaxy CEO Mike Novogratz had similar concerns about Bitcoin reserves in the United States.
“I think it would be smart for the United States to take the Bitcoin they have and maybe add a little bit… I don’t necessarily think the dollar needs anything to support it,” Novogratz confirm.