Someone paid far more than $three million in costs for a single Bitcoin transaction
On-chain information demonstrates a person paid 83.65 BTC ($three.14 million) in costs for a 139.42 BTC ($five.23 million) transfer. Someone paid far more than...
On-chain information demonstrates a person paid 83.65 BTC ($three.14 million) in costs for a 139.42 BTC ($five.23 million) transfer.
Someone paid far more than $three million in costs for a single Bitcoin transaction
On the evening of November 23, the crypto local community was astonished by the information that an anonymous wallet “bc1qn” paid 83.65 BTC (equivalent to three.14 million USD) for a transfer of 139.42 BTC (equivalent to five, 23 million USD) to the “ bc1qyf ” wallet.
The wallet “bc1qn” paid a transaction charge of 83.65 $BTC($three.14 million) when transferred 139.42 $BTC($five.23 million) in the “bc1qyf” portfolio.https://t.co/p5j9A82rvqhttps://t.co/NFnT9tZKID pic.twitter.com/Nc8BD7umYK
—Lookonchain (@lookonchain) November 23, 2023
It is unclear no matter whether this transaction was accidental or intentional. But the charge of three million bucks is not a little volume and helps make the local community regret since it represents far more than half of the worth sent by this wallet.
Gas overload incidents are no longer unusual in the cryptocurrency marketplace. In September 2023, a BTC transaction also expense USD 510,000 in costs for a transaction of just .07 BTC (USD two,000), the identity of this wallet was then all of a sudden unveiled to be the stablecoin issuer Paxos. Paxos then claimed that they have been incorrect and wished to return the dollars, but fortunately the F2Pool authentication unit agreed to return 19 BTC.
In the previous, a person invested as a lot as USD two.five million in costs just to send USD 133 ETH, or a .one ETH transaction had a charge of up to 2100 ETH.
The factors are incredibly various, from incorrect submission, to procedure error, to hacking, but some men and women are prepared to shell out exorbitant costs to full transactions as swiftly as doable. In most incidents, the authentication unit is prepared to return or halve the charge to the sender.
Coinlive compiled
Join the discussion on the hottest difficulties in the DeFi marketplace in the chat group Coinlive Chats Let’s join the administrators of Coinlive!!
More From Crypto News
Why Is Dash (DASH) Price Surging Today? Key Drivers
Dash (DASH) is trading at $49.55, up 10.16% in the past 24 hours as of November 5, 2026, placing it among the day’s top gainers in the broader altcoin market.
Binance Spot Share Falls to 42% After $6.3B Hack
Binance’s share of global spot trading has fallen to 42% in the wake of a reported $6.3 billion hack, with rival exchange OKX emerging as one of the clearest be...
Why Is Arbitrum (ARB) Price Surging Today? Key Drivers Explained
Arbitrum’s ARB token is trading at $0.159795, up 4.80% in the past 24 hours as of November 4, 2026, with spot volume reaching $0.11 billion on the day.
Binance Says Fake Interview Led Engineer to Run Malware
Binance says one of its engineers was deceived by a fake job interview into running malicious code on a work computer, the exchange disclosed in a security inci...
CFTC Faces Stock Perpetual Futures Legal Clash
FLASH — Tuesday: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is facing a legal clash involving stock perpetual futures after a clearing path emerged for a crypto v...
Why Is Stacks (STX) Price Down Today? Key Drivers
Stacks (STX) is trading at $0.320609 as of November 3, 2026, down 5.18% over the past 24 hours as sellers pushed the token to its lowest level in recent session...
