Someone paid far more than $three million in costs for a single Bitcoin transaction
On-chain information demonstrates a person paid 83.65 BTC ($three.14 million) in costs for a 139.42 BTC ($five.23 million) transfer. Someone paid far more than...
On-chain information demonstrates a person paid 83.65 BTC ($three.14 million) in costs for a 139.42 BTC ($five.23 million) transfer.
Someone paid far more than $three million in costs for a single Bitcoin transaction
On the evening of November 23, the crypto local community was astonished by the information that an anonymous wallet “bc1qn” paid 83.65 BTC (equivalent to three.14 million USD) for a transfer of 139.42 BTC (equivalent to five, 23 million USD) to the “ bc1qyf ” wallet.
The wallet “bc1qn” paid a transaction charge of 83.65 $BTC($three.14 million) when transferred 139.42 $BTC($five.23 million) in the “bc1qyf” portfolio.https://t.co/p5j9A82rvqhttps://t.co/NFnT9tZKID pic.twitter.com/Nc8BD7umYK
—Lookonchain (@lookonchain) November 23, 2023
It is unclear no matter whether this transaction was accidental or intentional. But the charge of three million bucks is not a little volume and helps make the local community regret since it represents far more than half of the worth sent by this wallet.
Gas overload incidents are no longer unusual in the cryptocurrency marketplace. In September 2023, a BTC transaction also expense USD 510,000 in costs for a transaction of just .07 BTC (USD two,000), the identity of this wallet was then all of a sudden unveiled to be the stablecoin issuer Paxos. Paxos then claimed that they have been incorrect and wished to return the dollars, but fortunately the F2Pool authentication unit agreed to return 19 BTC.
In the previous, a person invested as a lot as USD two.five million in costs just to send USD 133 ETH, or a .one ETH transaction had a charge of up to 2100 ETH.
The factors are incredibly various, from incorrect submission, to procedure error, to hacking, but some men and women are prepared to shell out exorbitant costs to full transactions as swiftly as doable. In most incidents, the authentication unit is prepared to return or halve the charge to the sender.
Coinlive compiled
Join the discussion on the hottest difficulties in the DeFi marketplace in the chat group Coinlive Chats Let’s join the administrators of Coinlive!!
More From Crypto News
Solana Sets Oct. 21 Alpenglow Handover With 82% Staked SOL Threshold
Solana has set October 21 as the handover date for Alpenglow, its proposed consensus upgrade, with the transition contingent on support from 82% of staked SOL.
Starknet Eyes L1 Shift and Quantum Resistance by 2027
Starknet is exploring a potential transition from an Ethereum Layer 2 scaling network to an independent Layer 1 blockchain, with quantum-resistant cryptography...
EPIC and QUICK Fall After Binance Delisting Announcement
Binance announced the upcoming delistings of EPIC and QUICK, sending both tokens lower as traders responded to the loss of access on one of crypto’s largest exc...
Ripple Adds DriveWealth and Meritz as Securities-Market Partners
Ripple has added DriveWealth, a US-based brokerage infrastructure provider, and Meritz, a South Korean financial firm, as securities-market partners, extending...
XRP Whale Activity on Binance Nears August Outflow Gap
XRP whale activity on Binance is picking up, with the exchange’s outflow gap narrowing toward levels last seen in August. The shift marks a meaningful change in...
US-Listed SUI ETFs Log Five Straight Weeks of Inflows
US-listed SUI exchange-traded funds have logged net inflows for five consecutive weeks, according to reporting from CryptoPotato and CryptoRank, signaling susta...
