Congressman Torres Proposes Crypto Trading Ban for Officials
Rep. Ritchie Torres seeks to ban federal officials from trading cryptocurrencies, impacting market dynamics.

- Proposal to restrict crypto trades by government officials.
- Memecoin markets show volatility, affecting Dogecoin, SHIB.
- Supporters cite precedents in insider trading laws.

On May 7, 2025, Congressman Ritchie Torres from New York proposed a bill to ban federal officials from owning or trading cryptocurrencies.
This proposal seeks to close regulatory gaps in cryptocurrency disclosure and prevent profiteering among federal officials.
Congressman Torres has introduced a legislative bill titled the “Stop Presidential Profiteering from Digital Assets Act.” The purpose is to prohibit federal officials from engaging in cryptocurrency trading or ownership due to potential conflict of interest concerns.
The legislation references the involvement of President Trump’s family in cryptocurrencies. It highlights projects like the TRUMP memecoin, aiming to address potential ethical conflicts in federal governance during the cryptocurrency’s ongoing rise in popularity.
News of the bill influenced cryptocurrency markets immediately. Memecoins experienced significant volatility, including notable declines in Dogecoin and Shiba Inu. Regulatory uncertainty has impacted traders’ decisions, causing shifts in market positions.
Previous laws against insider trading inspire this bill’s framework, with lawmakers like Representative Takano proposing similar measures to prevent federal officials’ memecoin profiteering. They cite the need to update rules for blockchain-based assets.
Public scrutiny focuses on ethical implications regarding federal officials’ digital asset involvement. Lawmakers supporting this bill argue for a clear regulatory framework to prevent misuse of privileged information and ensure transparency. Ritchie Torres, U.S. Congressman, New York’s 15th Congressional District, stated, “This legislation aims to ensure that federal officials are held to the highest ethical standards and are prohibited from profiting off of their public service through the realm of digital assets.”
Potential outcomes might include stricter regulations in the cryptocurrency sector, influencing both federal transparency and market behavior. Historical precedents from traditional securities regulations suggest an emphasis on clarity in asset ownership disclosure.
More From Crypto News
Crypto Market Cap Rose 39% in Q3, Ending Losing Streak: Report
The global crypto market capitalization posted a 39% gain in Q3, snapping a three-consecutive-quarter losing streak, according to a CoinGecko industry report. T...
Ledger Implant Thieves Steal $4.8M Bitcoin From Task Scam Operator
Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis has identified one of the largest victims of the Ledger hardware-wallet implant theft as a task scam operator, who lost mo...
Zcash NU7 Rules Would Block Sprout Pool Spending
Zcash’s proposed NU7 network upgrade would permanently block spending from the Sprout pool by invalidating version 4 transactions, the only transaction format t...
Aave Ethereum V3 Umbrella Stakes Fall 9.67% to $116.09M
Aave Umbrella is the protocol’s safety backstop mechanism on Ethereum V3, where participants stake assets to cover potential shortfalls. The tracked stake figur...
SEC Approves Cboe Binary Options Rules for Coinbase and MARA Metrics
The SEC has approved rule changes submitted by Cboe, clearing the regulatory path for a new class of binary options contracts linked to business metrics of Coin...
Bitcoin ETFs vs. Ethereum ETFs: Weekly Outflow Comparison
Net flow figures aggregate all fund-level movements into a single daily number. A negative weekly total means redemptions exceeded creations across all funds th...