Congressman Torres Proposes Crypto Trading Ban for Officials
Rep. Ritchie Torres seeks to ban federal officials from trading cryptocurrencies, impacting market dynamics.

- Proposal to restrict crypto trades by government officials.
- Memecoin markets show volatility, affecting Dogecoin, SHIB.
- Supporters cite precedents in insider trading laws.

On May 7, 2025, Congressman Ritchie Torres from New York proposed a bill to ban federal officials from owning or trading cryptocurrencies.
This proposal seeks to close regulatory gaps in cryptocurrency disclosure and prevent profiteering among federal officials.
Congressman Torres has introduced a legislative bill titled the “Stop Presidential Profiteering from Digital Assets Act.” The purpose is to prohibit federal officials from engaging in cryptocurrency trading or ownership due to potential conflict of interest concerns.
The legislation references the involvement of President Trump’s family in cryptocurrencies. It highlights projects like the TRUMP memecoin, aiming to address potential ethical conflicts in federal governance during the cryptocurrency’s ongoing rise in popularity.
News of the bill influenced cryptocurrency markets immediately. Memecoins experienced significant volatility, including notable declines in Dogecoin and Shiba Inu. Regulatory uncertainty has impacted traders’ decisions, causing shifts in market positions.
Previous laws against insider trading inspire this bill’s framework, with lawmakers like Representative Takano proposing similar measures to prevent federal officials’ memecoin profiteering. They cite the need to update rules for blockchain-based assets.
Public scrutiny focuses on ethical implications regarding federal officials’ digital asset involvement. Lawmakers supporting this bill argue for a clear regulatory framework to prevent misuse of privileged information and ensure transparency. Ritchie Torres, U.S. Congressman, New York’s 15th Congressional District, stated, “This legislation aims to ensure that federal officials are held to the highest ethical standards and are prohibited from profiting off of their public service through the realm of digital assets.”
Potential outcomes might include stricter regulations in the cryptocurrency sector, influencing both federal transparency and market behavior. Historical precedents from traditional securities regulations suggest an emphasis on clarity in asset ownership disclosure.
More From Crypto News
Polymarket Updates 5-Minute Bitcoin Contract Pricing
Polymarket is pricing its five-minute Bitcoin contracts using a 60-second average rather than a single point-in-time snapshot, according to the platform’s publi...
Intel, Oracle and IBM Object to OKX–ICE Tokenized Stock Plans
Intel, Oracle, IBM and IonQ have formally objected to the OKX–ICE tokenized stock plans, according to an October 26 public notice published by OKXICE — the join...
Ark Invest Buys Circle Shares, Sells Bitcoin ETF as BTC Falls
The two moves point in opposite directions within the crypto-linked investment space. Ark added exposure to Circle, the USD Coin issuer and stablecoin infrastru...
Ripple Approved to Operate as a U.S. National Trust Bank
A national trust bank is a federally chartered institution authorized to provide trust and fiduciary services, including asset custody, without engaging in comm...
Ethereum Foundation’s Latest ETH Sale Draws Criticism
The Ethereum Foundation has drawn fresh criticism following its latest sale of ETH, with observers describing the timing and communication around the transactio...
Strategy Pauses Bitcoin Buys as STRC Buybacks Continue
Strategy’s latest weekly update showed no new Bitcoin purchase reported, while the company continued repurchasing shares of its STRC preferred stock. The diverg...