Congressman Torres Proposes Crypto Trading Ban for Officials
Rep. Ritchie Torres seeks to ban federal officials from trading cryptocurrencies, impacting market dynamics.

- Proposal to restrict crypto trades by government officials.
- Memecoin markets show volatility, affecting Dogecoin, SHIB.
- Supporters cite precedents in insider trading laws.

On May 7, 2025, Congressman Ritchie Torres from New York proposed a bill to ban federal officials from owning or trading cryptocurrencies.
This proposal seeks to close regulatory gaps in cryptocurrency disclosure and prevent profiteering among federal officials.
Congressman Torres has introduced a legislative bill titled the “Stop Presidential Profiteering from Digital Assets Act.” The purpose is to prohibit federal officials from engaging in cryptocurrency trading or ownership due to potential conflict of interest concerns.
The legislation references the involvement of President Trump’s family in cryptocurrencies. It highlights projects like the TRUMP memecoin, aiming to address potential ethical conflicts in federal governance during the cryptocurrency’s ongoing rise in popularity.
News of the bill influenced cryptocurrency markets immediately. Memecoins experienced significant volatility, including notable declines in Dogecoin and Shiba Inu. Regulatory uncertainty has impacted traders’ decisions, causing shifts in market positions.
Previous laws against insider trading inspire this bill’s framework, with lawmakers like Representative Takano proposing similar measures to prevent federal officials’ memecoin profiteering. They cite the need to update rules for blockchain-based assets.
Public scrutiny focuses on ethical implications regarding federal officials’ digital asset involvement. Lawmakers supporting this bill argue for a clear regulatory framework to prevent misuse of privileged information and ensure transparency. Ritchie Torres, U.S. Congressman, New York’s 15th Congressional District, stated, “This legislation aims to ensure that federal officials are held to the highest ethical standards and are prohibited from profiting off of their public service through the realm of digital assets.”
Potential outcomes might include stricter regulations in the cryptocurrency sector, influencing both federal transparency and market behavior. Historical precedents from traditional securities regulations suggest an emphasis on clarity in asset ownership disclosure.
More From Crypto News
Fed Bank Reserves Fall $88.236B as Weekly Average Rises
Federal Reserve bank reserves dropped $88. 236 billion between the September 23 and September 30 Wednesday snapshots, even as the weekly average for the same pe...
Crypto Hacks Totaled $766M in September, Led by Bitget and Liquid Losses
Crypto hacks and exploits drained a reported $766 million in September, with losses tied to Bitget and Liquid exchange incidents leading the monthly tally, maki...
US Banking Group Sues OCC Over Crypto Trust Bank Approvals
A US banking industry group has filed a lawsuit against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, challenging the federal regulator’s decisions to approve...
20,000 ETH Moved From Bitfinex to Aave: What It Means
On-chain monitoring service Whale Alert flagged a transfer of 20,000 ETH from Bitfinex to an address attributed to Aave on Oct. 3, 2026 at 14:06:47 UTC, valuing...
Bitcoin Breaks $85K Sell Wall, Glassnode Says
Bitcoin has pushed through the $85,000 sell wall that had been capping upside momentum, according to on-chain analytics firm Glassnode. The break removes a laye...
VanEck BNB ETF Adds Staking Objective
VanEck has amended the mandate for its spot BNB ETF, ticker VBNB, adding staking as a secondary investment objective and appointing Figment to support execution...