Congressman Torres Proposes Crypto Trading Ban for Officials
Rep. Ritchie Torres seeks to ban federal officials from trading cryptocurrencies, impacting market dynamics.

- Proposal to restrict crypto trades by government officials.
- Memecoin markets show volatility, affecting Dogecoin, SHIB.
- Supporters cite precedents in insider trading laws.

On May 7, 2025, Congressman Ritchie Torres from New York proposed a bill to ban federal officials from owning or trading cryptocurrencies.
This proposal seeks to close regulatory gaps in cryptocurrency disclosure and prevent profiteering among federal officials.
Congressman Torres has introduced a legislative bill titled the “Stop Presidential Profiteering from Digital Assets Act.” The purpose is to prohibit federal officials from engaging in cryptocurrency trading or ownership due to potential conflict of interest concerns.
The legislation references the involvement of President Trump’s family in cryptocurrencies. It highlights projects like the TRUMP memecoin, aiming to address potential ethical conflicts in federal governance during the cryptocurrency’s ongoing rise in popularity.
News of the bill influenced cryptocurrency markets immediately. Memecoins experienced significant volatility, including notable declines in Dogecoin and Shiba Inu. Regulatory uncertainty has impacted traders’ decisions, causing shifts in market positions.
Previous laws against insider trading inspire this bill’s framework, with lawmakers like Representative Takano proposing similar measures to prevent federal officials’ memecoin profiteering. They cite the need to update rules for blockchain-based assets.
Public scrutiny focuses on ethical implications regarding federal officials’ digital asset involvement. Lawmakers supporting this bill argue for a clear regulatory framework to prevent misuse of privileged information and ensure transparency. Ritchie Torres, U.S. Congressman, New York’s 15th Congressional District, stated, “This legislation aims to ensure that federal officials are held to the highest ethical standards and are prohibited from profiting off of their public service through the realm of digital assets.”
Potential outcomes might include stricter regulations in the cryptocurrency sector, influencing both federal transparency and market behavior. Historical precedents from traditional securities regulations suggest an emphasis on clarity in asset ownership disclosure.
More From Crypto News
SideSwap Reopens Liquid Markets; L-BTC Redemptions Still Paused
SideSwap says its Liquid markets reopened on September 10, 2026, after Liquid resumed block production, but L-BTC redemptions into Bitcoin remain suspended whil...
US House Panel Sets Sept. 16 Crypto Tax Rules Markup
The US House Ways and Means Committee has reportedly set a September 16 markup for crypto tax rules, though no official notice confirms the date. What is docume...
U.S. Bank Tests USBDC Cross-Border Transfers on Stellar
The named asset in the test is USBDC, and the named settlement rail is the public Stellar network . The trial evaluates whether the bank can move that stablecoi...
Kalshi Seeks US Approval for Single-Stock Perpetual Futures
Kalshi is seeking US approval for single-stock perpetual futures tied to Tesla, Apple, and Nvidia, extending the prediction-market operator’s push into perpetua...
Cantor Doubles Bitmine Price Target to $63.60
Cantor Fitzgerald has doubled its Bitmine price target to $63. 60, framing the company’s Ethereum treasury strategy as a maturing investment proposition, the ne...
Circle’s EURC Goes Live on Upbit in South Korea
The report identifies three things: the asset is EURC, the platform is Upbit, and the market is South Korea. A single source, Crypto Briefing, reported the list...